OS X – It took five years but finally it was a very good replacement for Mac OS But IBM kept chanting, “OS/2 is dead” so I switched to I don’t know if Describe still works on it but it is a Word Processor that died back in the 90s. In the more than 30 years of using DOS and Windows, I have also hated DOS and Windows.
Is mac mini 2018 upgradable drivers#
I’ve written programs including drivers for DOS and Windows and applications for bank branches and mortgage software. I have support Microsoft OSs since DOS 1.x. Apple is doing good work in some of those areas but not putting it all together yet. The frontier of OS is on the wall and on small screens either mounted or worn. Resolution is very different, and input methods (including sensors) give the UI a very different form, but underneath they are similar.Īpple should launch Tos for Internet of Things OS, where at low resolution it’s a wearable or small interface, and at high resolution it’s a wall/TV interface. They won’t open up the interface and promote it to developers, who knows why.Įven the wrist - that’s an interface that’s not very different than wall/TV in the basic selection mechanics. They’ve mastered touch and desktop but they ignore these new interfaces at their own peril.ĪppleTV is their only foray into the space and it’s just a dumber roku. I think they continue to miss the boat in regards to the wall/TV interface. I don’t even want to customize it, just let me send desktop as default for certain web pages. It’s not the fix we all would prefer, but it is most definitely a fix. In fact, it’s obvious that they’ve done some work to make touch easier… so why does it insist on serving an iPad ua string a stripped down, damn near useless, interface? I can’t fix the Synology, so the ability to fix the problem from my device would be welcome. It’s stupid, because the desktop interface, once loaded, works fine with a touch interface.
It has one problem though, it insists on giving me a mobile page when I use my iPad until I tell it to request desktop. It does fix the problem when you don’t have control over the site and the site admins/device makers just won’t fix it. My point though, is that this still doesn’t actually fix the problem. That said, I would welcome the idea of Apple adding UA string customization to iOS Safari – I have no problem with that. Bugs that are not reported don’t get fixed… That is duct tape and bubble gum – solving the problem requires getting the developer to fix their bugs, because it is a bug.īugs should be reported, not “worked around” through sleight of hand. That doesn’t solve anything! The problem is still there, left festering forever, because instead of addressing the real problem you basically just tell your browser to lie. I can only assume what you are getting at is some of those browsers let you change your UA string. The same applies to Mozilla, or Opera, or any browser on any platform… I don’t see how any of what I said has anything at all to do with Apple. If you also want to “yell at the website”, you can do that too! However, if you want a desktop website, you can have that also. If you want what the website the creator thinks you should have, you can have it.
On a more open platforms, they tend to deal in reality. This demonstrates the Apple way of thinking. That is a really shitty thing to do, and you should be mad at them about it. Secondly, if Apple changed the UA string to not include “mobile”, thousands of sites would still be broken, because they actually look for the “iPad” string – because whoever made them wants them to return mobile versions to iPads – regardless of what you think about it.
It will invariably break, sooner rather than later, and it should be avoided like the plague. Whats not correct is using this information to control content delivery. The solution, however, is not to make browsers lie about their nature – an iPad is a mobile device – reporting itself as one is the correct thing to do. I understand that the world is not perfect, the mechanisms to do this properly have not always existed, and there are sites that don’t always do what you think is the “right thing”. If you want something done about it complain to the website maintainer. Some websites use the UA string to determine what version of the website to return. All Safari does is render what is returned by the website – it has no control in the matter and never has. The OP said Safari defaults to “giving me a mobile page”. It’s all well and good to say “not our problem, it’s the web page” but that doesn’t help those of us who have to deal with those pages. What the op is saying, and I agree, is it would be nice to force the desktop user-agent as default. Actually, Safari does default to a mobile/iPad user-agent.
0 kommentar(er)
